MasterCraft 215V 2011 boat specs
MasterCraft
MasterCraft 215V 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 boat specs
MasterCraft
MasterCraft CSX 265 2008
2008
View full specs →

MasterCraft 215V 2011 vs MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the MasterCraft 215V 2011 and the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 measures 26,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 4,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the MasterCraft 215V 2011 at 21,7 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the MasterCraft 215V 2011 tips the scales at 3 425 lbs — 2 650 lbs more than the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 at 775 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 is rated for 16 passengers, while the MasterCraft 215V 2011 caps at 14. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 16 passengers and at 26,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The MasterCraft 215V 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 14 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMasterCraft
MakeMasterCraft
Model215V
ModelCSX 265
Model Year2011
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Depth - Detail28 in. (0.7 m) transom 32 in. (0.8 m) amidship
Depth - DetailTransom: 32 in. Amidship: 25 in
Depth - Centimeters81.28
Depth - Centimeters81.28
Depth - Inches32
Depth - Inches32
Draft [max] - Detail26.5 in. (0.67 m)
Draft [max] - Detail32 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Meters0.81
Draft [max] - Inches26.5
Draft [max] - Inches32
Weight - Detail3,425 lbs. (1,554 kg)
Weight - Detail7,750 lbs. (3,515 kg)
Weight - kg1553.55
Weight - kg3515.34
Weight - lbs.3425
Weight - lbs.775
Width [transom] - Detail100 in. (2.54 m) amidship
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - Detail107 in. (2.7 m) standard tower to lowest point on keel
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters2.72
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches107
Height - Inchesnot available
Length - Feet21.67
Length - Feet26
Length [over all with swim platform]23 ft. 9 in. (7.24 m)
Length [over all with swim platform]29 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 8 in. (6.6 m)
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 5 in
Length overall - Meters6.6
Length overall - Meters8.05
Length overall - Inches26
Length overall - Inches317
Beamnot available
Beam114 in. (2.09 m)
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters2.9
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches114
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters8.05
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches5
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine makeIndmar, Ilmore
Engine makenot available
Engine modelIndmar: MCX 5.7 l 350 CID V-8, 312 hp (230 kW) Indmar: L96 6.0 l V-8, 386 hp (284 kW) Ilmore: 5.7 l V-8, 325 hp (239 kW) Ilmore: 6.0 l V-8, 386 hp (284 kW)
Engine modelnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail45 gal. (170 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail125 gal. (473 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters170.34
Fuel tank capacity - Liters473.18
Fuel tank capacity - Gal45
Fuel tank capacity - Gal125
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,325 lbs. (1,055 kg)
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people14
Maximum people16 (yacht)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 4 in. (7.4 m) 22 ft. 2 in. (6.8 m) swing away tongue
Trailer - Length over all32 ft. 2 in
Trailer - Weight1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Trailer - WeightTandem-axle: 1,250 lbs
Trailer - Width100 in. (2.54 m)
Trailer - WidthTandem-axle: 114 in

MasterCraft 215V 2011 vs MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the MasterCraft 215V 2011 or the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008?
The MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 is the longer of the two at 26,0 feet overall. The MasterCraft 215V 2011 comes in at 21,7 feet, making it roughly 4,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the MasterCraft 215V 2011 or the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008?
For trailering, the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 has the edge at 775 lbs dry weight versus 3 425 lbs for the MasterCraft 215V 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The MasterCraft 215V 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 14 passengers, while the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 is certified for 16. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the MasterCraft 215V 2011 or the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008?
The MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 has the bigger tank at 125 gallons, versus 45 gallons on the MasterCraft 215V 2011. That 80-gallon difference translates to roughly 240–400 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the MasterCraft 215V 2011 and MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the MasterCraft 215V 2011 and the MasterCraft CSX 265 2008 are built by MasterCraft. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.