Marquis Yachts 690 2010 boat specs
Marquis Yachts
Marquis Yachts 690 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Marquis Yachts Marquis 50  2008 boat specs
Marquis Yachts
Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008
2008
View full specs →

Marquis Yachts 690 2010 vs Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 — Which Semi Displacement Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 and the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 are semi displacement designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 measures 70,0 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 19,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 at 51,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 tips the scales at 56 227 lbs — 56 133 lbs less than the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 at 94 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 is rated for up to 20 people. Passenger data for the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 wasn't available.

Bottom line: The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 at 70,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 at 51,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeMarquis Yachts
MakeMarquis Yachts
Model69
ModelMarquis? 5
Model Year201
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam18 ft. 0 in. (5.5 m) with gunnel molding
Beam15 ft. (4.6 m) with gunnel molding
Beam - Meters5.49
Beam - Meters4.57
Beam - Inches216
Beam - Inches18
Bridge clearance - Detail24 ft. 5 in. (7.4 m) with arch
Bridge clearance - Detail19 ft. 11 in. (5.8 m) waterline to arch
Bridge clearance - Meters7.44
Bridge clearance - Meters6.07
Bridge clearance - Inches293
Bridge clearance - Inches239
Draft [max] - Detail5 ft. 4 in. (1.6 m)
Draft [max] - Detail57 in. (1.4 m)
Draft [max] - Meters1.63
Draft [max] - Meters1.45
Draft [max] - Inches64
Draft [max] - Inches57
Weight - Detail47 T (43 t) with fuel and water
Weight - Detail56,227 lbs. (25,504 kg) with fuel and water
Weight - kg42637.65
Weight - kg25504.12
Weight - lbs.94
Weight - lbs.56227
Length - Feet70.04
Length - Feet51
Length [over all with swim platform]70 ft. 0.5 in. (21.3 m) also includes gunnel molding
Length [over all with swim platform]51 ft. 6 in. (15.7 m)
Length overall - Detail65 ft. 10 in. (20 m) molded hull
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters20.07
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches79
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters15.7
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeSemi Displacement
Hull typeSemi Displacement
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardCAT® C18 - 1,015 hp
Engine/s standardVolvo Penta? D9 EVC, 575 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail1,200 gal. (4,542 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail600 gal. (2,271 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters4542.49
Fuel tank capacity - Liters2271.25
Fuel tank capacity - Gal12
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel typeDiesel
Fuel typeDiesel
Drive typeInboard
Drive typeInboard
Operational Info
Headroom6 ft. 8 in. (2 m) cabin
Headroom6 ft. 6 in. (2 m) cabin
Sleeping capacity6
Sleeping capacity4 (6 optional)
Water capacity200 gal. (757 l)
Water capacity150 gal. (568 l)
Water heater capacity(2) 16 gal. (60.5 l) each
Water heater capacity20 gal. (75.7 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail153 gal. (580 l)
Holding tank capacity - Detail80 gal. (303 l)
Holding tank capacity - Liters579.17
Holding tank capacity - Liters302.83
Holding tank capacity - Gal153
Holding tank capacity - Gal8

Marquis Yachts 690 2010 vs Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 or the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008?
The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 is the longer of the two at 70,0 feet overall. The Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 comes in at 51,0 feet, making it roughly 19,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 or the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008?
For trailering, the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 has the edge at 94 lbs dry weight versus 56 227 lbs for the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many passengers can the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 carry?
The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 has an official capacity rating of 20 people. Capacity data wasn't available for the other model in this comparison — verify directly with the dealer.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 measures 216" wide, compared to 18" for the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 or the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008?
The Marquis Yachts 690 2010 has the bigger tank at 12 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008. That 6-gallon difference translates to roughly 18–30 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 and Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Marquis Yachts 690 2010 and the Marquis Yachts Marquis 50 2008 are built by Marquis Yachts. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.