The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 vs Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 at 50,6 ft versus Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 at 49,1 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 tips the scales at 35 999 lbs — 3 185 lbs more than the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 at 32 814 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 tops out at 110 hp. Engine specs for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 15 gal and 15 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 is rated for 15 passengers, while the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 caps at 14. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 could be the deciding factor.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 displaces 35 999 lbs — a 3 185-lb difference over the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 at 32 814 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Both boats draw a similar depth — 5,6 ft and 5,6 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.
The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 uses fractional_rig_sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 uses a 1 wheel versus a 2 wheels on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 has a documented auxiliary engine of 110 hp.
Hull speed is rated at 9,0 knots for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 and 8,9 knots for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 carries 194 gallons versus 2 gallons on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.
Bottom line: The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 47 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2016 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 35 999 lbs displacement and 51 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 50 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 at 32 814 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.