The Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 vs Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 at 34,7 ft versus Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 at 33,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 tips the scales at 15 329 lbs — 2 930 lbs more than the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 at 12 399 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 29 hp for the Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 and 29 hp for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 carries 37 gallons versus 25 gallons in the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 10 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 displaces 15 329 lbs — a 2 930-lb difference over the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 at 12 399 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.
Both boats draw a similar depth — 4,1 ft and 4,6 ft respectively. Marina access and anchorage options should be broadly equivalent between the two.
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 uses fractional_rig_sloop rigging.
Hull speed is rated at 7,5 knots for the Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 and 7,3 knots for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011. For extended cruising, water capacity matters: the Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 carries 75 gallons versus 50 gallons on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 — a significant advantage on longer passages where watermaker or provisioning stops aren't guaranteed.
Bottom line: The Marlow Hunter Hunter 36 - 2011 Furling mainsail Furling mainsail 2011 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 15 329 lbs displacement and 35 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 33 Shoal draft Shoal draft 2011 at 12 399 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.