Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 boat specs
Marlow Hunter
Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004
2004
View full specs →
VS
Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 boat specs
Marlow Hunter
Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011
2011
View full specs →

Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 vs Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 vs Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 measures 33,6 feet overall (2004), giving it roughly 12,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 at 21,4 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 tips the scales at 10 269 lbs — 7 019 lbs more than the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 at 3 250 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 29 hp for the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 and 10 hp for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is rated for 10 passengers, while the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 could be the deciding factor.

Displacement is where these two sailboats genuinely part ways. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 displaces 10 269 lbs — a 7 019-lb difference over the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 at 3 250 lbs. That gap separates two entirely different categories of sailing: the heavier boat is built for offshore passage-making and load-carrying, while the lighter hull rewards performance sailing and easier handling in lighter air.

Draft is a practical consideration that many buyers underestimate until they're already at the marina. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 draws 5,6 ft, compared to 3,6 ft for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. That 2,0-foot difference affects which anchorages you can access, which haul-out facilities will take you, and how carefully you need to read the tide tables in shallower cruising grounds.

The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 uses Sloop rigging. Helm style differs too: the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 uses a 1 wheel versus a 1 tiller on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. Wheel helms give better leverage and visibility on larger boats; tillers offer direct feedback and simplicity on smaller ones. For auxiliary power the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 carries a 29-hp engine against 10 hp on the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. Motoring range and ability to punch through a foul current or enter a tight marina under power will favour the more powerful installation.

The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 is trailerable — a genuine advantage for sailors who prefer to keep their boat at home or explore multiple sailing venues. Hull speed is rated at 7,3 knots for the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 and 5,8 knots for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011.

Bottom line: The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is the offshore and bluewater choice — at 10 269 lbs displacement and 34 ft it has the load capacity, range, and seakeeping for extended passages. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 at 3 250 lbs is the more nimble, accessible option and is trailerable — easier to single-hand and better suited to coastal and inland sailing.
Measurements / Dimensions
Length overall - Detail33.60 ft
Length overall - Detail21.40 ft
Length - Feet33.6
Length - Feet21.4
Length overall - Meters10.24
Length overall - Meters6.52
Length overall - Inches403
Length overall - Inches257
Beam11.60 ft
Beam7.11 ft
Beam - Meters3.54
Beam - Meters2.17
Beam - Inches139
Beam - Inches85
Draft [max] - Detail5.60 ft
Draft [max] - Detail3.60 ft
Draft [max] - Meters1.71
Draft [max] - Meters1.1
Draft [max] - Inches67
Draft [max] - Inches43
Displacement10269.00 lbs
Displacement3250.00 lbs
Body / Hull
Rudder1 spade rudder
Rudder1 transom hung rudder
Helm1 wheel
Helm1 tiller
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Gal25.1
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters95.01
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Horsepower29 hp
Horsepower10 hp
Drive typeinboard
Drive typeoutboard
Performance
Maximum speed7.27
Maximum speed5.8
Maximum speed measureknots
Maximum speed measureknots
Operational Info
Water capacity49.9
Water capacitynot available
Holding tank capacity - Gal25.1
Holding tank capacity - Galnot available
Holding tank capacity - Liters95.01
Holding tank capacity - Litersnot available
RiggingSloop
RiggingSloop
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Mast ConfigurationDeck stepped mast
Boat typeSail
Boat typeSail
Trailerablenot available
TrailerableYes

Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 vs Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 or the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011?
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is the longer of the two at 33,6 feet overall. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 comes in at 21,4 feet, making it roughly 12,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 or the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011?
For trailering, the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 has the edge at 3 250 lbs dry weight versus 10 269 lbs for the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is rated to a maximum of 29 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 tops out at 10 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 10 passengers, while the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the deeper draft — the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 or the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011?
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 has the deeper draft at 5,6 ft, versus 3,6 ft for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. A deeper draft generally means better upwind performance and stability, but limits access to shallow anchorages and some marina berths. Always check the controlling depth of your home port and favourite cruising grounds before committing.
Is the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 or the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 better suited for offshore sailing?
For offshore work, displacement and construction are the primary indicators. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 at 10 269 lbs displacement is the heavier, more load-carrying design — generally better suited to extended passages where seakeeping and provisioning capacity matter most. The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 at 3 250 lbs will typically be livelier and more responsive in lighter conditions.
Can the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 be trailered?
The Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 is listed as trailerable, giving owners the flexibility to launch from any suitable ramp and avoid permanent berthing costs. The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 is not listed as trailerable — it will need a marina berth or mooring.
Which is the faster sailboat — the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 or the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011?
Based on rated hull speed, the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 has an edge at 7,3 knots versus 5,8 knots for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. Keep in mind that actual sailing speed depends heavily on wind conditions, sail trim, bottom condition, and skipper experience — hull speed is a theoretical maximum, not a guarantee.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 measures 139" wide, compared to 85" for the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 and Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Marlow Hunter Hunter 33 - 2004 Deep draft Deep draft 2004 and the Marlow Hunter Marlow Hunter 22 2011 are built by Marlow Hunter. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.