When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Maritime 1690 2012 and the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 are modified vee designs with composite construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 measures 25,7 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 9,2 additional feet of deck space compared to the Maritime 1690 2012 at 16,5 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 tips the scales at 365 lbs — 353 lbs less than the Maritime 1690 2012 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The Maritime 1690 2012 carries a rated maximum of 75 hp. Engine data for the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 carries 83 gallons versus 26 gallons in the Maritime 1690 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Maritime 1690 2012 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Maritime 25 Challenger 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 25,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Maritime 1690 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.