Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 boat specs
Marathon
Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Marathon Otisco  2013 boat specs
Marathon
Marathon Otisco 2013
2013
View full specs →

Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 vs Marathon Otisco 2013: Same Brand, Different Boat

The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 is a pontoon design and the Marathon Otisco 2013 is a flat-bottom design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 measures 16,0 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 6,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Marathon Otisco 2013 at 10,0 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 tips the scales at 1 460 lbs - 1 364 lbs more than the Marathon Otisco 2013 at 96 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 has a 37-hp advantage over the Marathon Otisco 2013's 3-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Marathon Otisco 2013 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Marathon Otisco 2013 comes in at 32 lbs per hp versus 37 lbs per hp for the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Marathon Otisco 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMarathon
MakeMarathon
ModelGrumman Classic 1680CFP
ModelOtisco
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. deck width
Beamnot available
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail1,460 lbs.
Weight - Detail96 lbs.
Weight - kg662.24
Weight - kg43.54
Weight - lbs.1460
Weight - lbs.96
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet10
Length overall - Detail16 ft.
Length overall - Detail10 ft.
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters3.05
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches120
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail14 in.
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters35.56
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches14
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail53 in. 49 in. width at center seat
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]15 in.
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.080 in.
Hull thickness0.050 in.
Hull typePontoon
Hull typeFlat
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter23 in.
Tube diameternot available
Number of tubes2
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp
Engine max3 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,464 lbs.
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people6 / 1,070 lbs.
Maximum people2 / 400 lbs.

Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 vs Marathon Otisco 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 or the Marathon Otisco 2013?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Marathon Otisco 2013 comes in at 10,0 feet, making it roughly 6,0 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 or the Marathon Otisco 2013?
For trailering, the Marathon Otisco 2013 has the edge at 96 lbs dry weight versus 1 460 lbs for the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Marathon Otisco 2013 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Marathon Otisco 2013 is certified for 2. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Marathon Otisco 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 32 lbs per hp compared to 37 lbs per hp for the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane - the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Are the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 and Marathon Otisco 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Marathon Grumman Classic 1680CFP 2012 and the Marathon Otisco 2013 are built by Marathon. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.