Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 boat specs
Marathon
Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 boat specs
Marathon
Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013
2013
View full specs →

Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 vs Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 against a pontoon Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 measures 14,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 13,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 at 1,0 feet (2010). At 96 lbs and 11 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 25 hp, the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 has a 22-hp advantage over the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 is rated for 4 passengers, while the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 32 lbs per hp for the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 4 passengers and at 14,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMarathon
MakeMarathon
ModelDN 1036 Jon
ModelGrumman Classic 1460F
Model Year201
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Depth - Detail14 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters35.56
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches14
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail96 lbs
Weight - Detail1,100 lbs
Weight - kg43.54
Weight - kg498.95
Weight - lbs.96
Weight - lbs.11
Width [transom] - Detail53 in. 49 in. width at center seat
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]15 in
Height [transom]not available
Length - Feet1
Length - Feet14
Length overall - Detail10 ft
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters3.05
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches12
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Beamnot available
Beam6 ft. deck width
Beam - Metersnot available
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Inchesnot available
Beam - Inches72
Length [at waterline]not available
Length [at waterline]14 ft. log length
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.050 in
Hull thickness0.080 in
Hull typeFlat
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max3 hp
Engine max25 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people2 / 400 lbs
Maximum people4 / 595 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity920 lbs
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter19 in
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2

Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 vs Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 or the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 is the longer of the two at 14,0 feet overall. The Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 comes in at 1,0 feet, making it roughly 13,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 or the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013?
For trailering, the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 has the edge at 11 lbs dry weight versus 96 lbs for the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 is rated to a maximum of 25 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 tops out at 3 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 0 lbs per hp compared to 32 lbs per hp for the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Are the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 and Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Marathon DN 1036 Jon 2010 and the Marathon Grumman Classic 1460F 2013 are built by Marathon. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.