Malibu Ride XTi 2006 boat specs
Malibu
Malibu Ride XTi 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 boat specs
Malibu
Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012
2012
View full specs →

Malibu Ride XTi 2006 vs Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 and the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 are modified vee designs with composite construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Malibu Ride XTi 2006 at 21,0 ft versus Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 at 22,3 ft. At 29 lbs and 4 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 400 hp, the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 has a 50-hp advantage over the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012's 350-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 carries 37 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 is rated for 15 passengers, while the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 caps at 1. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 15 passengers and at 22,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Malibu Ride XTi 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 1 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMalibu
MakeMalibu
ModelRide XTi
ModelWakesetter 22 MXZ
Model Year2006
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in. (2.49 m)
Beam102 in. (2.59 m)
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches102
Draft [max] - Detail24 in. (.61 m)
Draft [max] - Detail27 in. (0.69 m)
Draft [max] - Meters0.61
Draft [max] - Meters0.69
Draft [max] - Inches24
Draft [max] - Inches27
Weight - Detail2,900 lbs. (1,315 kg)
Weight - Detail4,000 lbs. (1,814 kg)
Weight - kg1315.42
Weight - kg1814.37
Weight - lbs.29
Weight - lbs.4
Length - Meters6.4
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet21
Length - Feet22.25
Length overall - Detail21 ft. 0 in. (6.40 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 3 in. (6.78 m)
Length overall - Meters6.4
Length overall - Meters6.78
Length overall - Inches252
Length overall - Inches267
Body / Hull
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMalibu LCR 320 hp EFI-MPI
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail37 gal. (155 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal. (189 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters140.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal37
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Drive typeI/O
Drive typeV-drive
Engine max400 hp
Engine maxnot available
Engine modelnot available
Engine modelMalibu Monsoon 35
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Horsepowernot available
Horsepower350 hp
Operational Info
Maximum people1
Maximum people15

Malibu Ride XTi 2006 vs Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 or the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012?
The Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 is the longer of the two at 22,3 feet overall. The Malibu Ride XTi 2006 comes in at 21,0 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 or the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012?
For trailering, the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 has the edge at 4 lbs dry weight versus 29 lbs for the Malibu Ride XTi 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Malibu Ride XTi 2006 is rated to a maximum of 400 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 tops out at 350 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Malibu Ride XTi 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 1 passengers, while the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 is certified for 15. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 measures 102" wide, compared to 98" for the Malibu Ride XTi 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 or the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012?
The Malibu Ride XTi 2006 has the bigger tank at 37 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012. That 32-gallon difference translates to roughly 96–160 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 and Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Malibu Ride XTi 2006 and the Malibu Wakesetter 22 MXZ 2012 are built by Malibu. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.