When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Mako Boats Pro 16 Skiff CC 2013 and the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mako Boats Pro 16 Skiff CC 2013 at 15,8 ft versus Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 at 17,3 ft. At 88 lbs and 95 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Mako Boats Pro 16 Skiff CC 2013 and 60 hp for the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 7 gal and 6 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 comes in at 2 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Mako Boats Pro 16 Skiff CC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Mako Boats Pro 16 Skiff CC 2013 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.