Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009
2009
View full specs →

Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 vs Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 against a deep vee Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 at 23,3 ft versus Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 at 26,0 ft. At 35 lbs and 45 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 has a 75-hp advantage over the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009's 225-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 carries 194 gallons versus 15 gallons in the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 11 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 at 26,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 at 23,3 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeMako Boats
MakeMako Boats
Model234 Center Console
Model264 Center Console
Model Year201
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam9 ft. 2 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.79
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches11
Deadrise21°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail18 in
Draft [max] - Detail20 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.46
Draft [max] - Meters0.51
Draft [max] - Inches18
Draft [max] - Inches2
Weight - Detail3,500 lbs
Weight - Detail4,500 lbs
Weight - kg1587.57
Weight - kg2041.16
Weight - lbs.35
Weight - lbs.45
Height [transom]30 in
Height [transom]30 in
Length - Feet23.33
Length - Feet26
Length overall - Detail23.33 ft
Length overall - Detail26 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters7.11
Length overall - Meters7.92
Length overall - Inches279.96
Length overall - Inches312
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard225 XXL OptiMax®
Engine/s standard225 XXL OptiMax®
Fuel tank capacity - Detail150 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail194 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters567.81
Fuel tank capacity - Liters734.37
Fuel tank capacity - Gal15
Fuel tank capacity - Gal194
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard - Twin
Engine max300 hp
Engine max225 hp each (Twin)
Operational Info
Maximum people11
Maximum people11 / 3,693 lbs

Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 vs Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 or the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009?
The Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 is the longer of the two at 26,0 feet overall. The Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 comes in at 23,3 feet, making it roughly 2,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 or the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009?
For trailering, the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 has the edge at 35 lbs dry weight versus 45 lbs for the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 tops out at 225 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 is certified for 11. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 measures 102" wide, compared to 11" for the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 or the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009?
The Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 has the bigger tank at 194 gallons, versus 15 gallons on the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010. That 179-gallon difference translates to roughly 537–895 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 and Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Mako Boats 234 Center Console 2010 and the Mako Boats 264 Center Console 2009 are built by Mako Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.