Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012
2012
View full specs →

Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 vs Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 vs Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 at 19,0 ft versus Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 at 17,3 ft. At 26 lbs and 95 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 has a 90-hp advantage over the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 8 gal and 6 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 with its 60-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeMako Boats
MakeMako Boats
Model195 Dual Console
ModelPro 17 Skiff CC
Model Year2006
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in
Beam80 in
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches8
Deadrise16℃
Deadrise10°
Draft [max] - Detail12 in
Draft [max] - Detail8 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.3
Draft [max] - Meters0.2
Draft [max] - Inches12
Draft [max] - Inches8
Weight - Detail2,600 lbs. Max. Cumulative Engine Weight: 525 lbs
Weight - Detail950 lbs. hull
Weight - kg1179.34
Weight - kg430.91
Weight - lbs.26
Weight - lbs.95
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet17.33
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.89
Length overall - Meters5.28
Length overall - Inches232
Length overall - Inches208
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailCockpit: 18 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters45.72
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches18
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 135XL OptiMax
Engine/s standard30 ELPT FourStroke EFI
Fuel tank capacity - Detail80 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail6 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters302.83
Fuel tank capacity - Liters22.71
Fuel tank capacity - Gal8
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp
Engine max60 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,400 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people5 / 850 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height6 ft. 8 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all22 ft. 4 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - WeightPackage Weight: 1,700 lbs

Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 vs Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 or the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012?
The Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 is the longer of the two at 19,0 feet overall. The Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 comes in at 17,3 feet, making it roughly 1,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 or the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012?
For trailering, the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 has the edge at 26 lbs dry weight versus 95 lbs for the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 measures 102" wide, compared to 8" for the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 and Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 8 gallons and 6 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 and Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Mako Boats 195 Dual Console 2006 and the Mako Boats Pro 17 Skiff CC 2012 are built by Mako Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.