Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010
2010
View full specs →

Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 vs Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 vs Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 at 19,0 ft versus Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 at 19,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 tips the scales at 132 lbs — 116 lbs more than the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 at 16 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 has a 25-hp advantage over the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 47 gal and 47 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 with its 150-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeMako Boats
MakeMako Boats
Model191 Inshore
Model191 Tunnel Inshore
Model Year2006
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam99 in
Beam8 ft. 2 in
Beam - Meters2.51
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches99
Beam - Inches98
Weight - Detail1,320 lbs
Weight - Detail1,600 lbs
Weight - kg598.74
Weight - kg725.75
Weight - lbs.132
Weight - lbs.16
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet19
Length - Feet19.17
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail19.17 ft
Length overall - Meters5.87
Length overall - Meters5.84
Length overall - Inches231
Length overall - Inches230.04
Deadrisenot available
Deadrise15°
Draft [max] - Detailnot available
Draft [max] - Detail16 in
Draft [max] - Metersnot available
Draft [max] - Meters0.41
Draft [max] - Inchesnot available
Draft [max] - Inches16
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 90 EXLPT OptiMax?
Engine/s standard115 ELPT OptiMax®
Fuel tank capacity - Detail47 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail47 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters177.91
Fuel tank capacity - Liters177.91
Fuel tank capacity - Gal47
Fuel tank capacity - Gal47
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp
Engine max175 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum capacity1,500 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people6 / 900 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailCustom single axle trailer
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Weight2,600 lbs
Trailer - WeightPackage Weight: 2,600 lbs
Trailer - Width100 in
Trailer - Width100 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeTunnel

Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 vs Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 or the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010?
The Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 is the longer of the two at 19,2 feet overall. The Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 comes in at 19,0 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 or the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010?
For trailering, the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 has the edge at 16 lbs dry weight versus 132 lbs for the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 measures 99" wide, compared to 98" for the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 and Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 47 gallons and 47 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 and Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Mako Boats 191 Inshore 2006 and the Mako Boats 191 Tunnel Inshore 2010 are built by Mako Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.