Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 184 CC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010
2010
View full specs →

Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 vs Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 against a modified vee Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 measures 28,3 feet overall (2010), giving it roughly 10,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 at 18,3 feet (2013). At 18 lbs and 6 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 has a 150-hp advantage over the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 carries 235 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 13 passengers and at 28,3 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeMako Boats
MakeMako Boats
Model184 CC
Model284 Center Console
Model Year2013
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 2 in
Beam9 ft. 10 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters3
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches118
Deadrise18°
Deadrise21°
Draft [max] - Detail12 in
Draft [max] - Detail21 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.3
Draft [max] - Meters0.53
Draft [max] - Inches12
Draft [max] - Inches21
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - Detail6,000 lbs
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - kg2721.55
Weight - lbs.18
Weight - lbs.6
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]30 in
Length - Feet18.33
Length - Feet28.33
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail28.33 ft
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Meters8.64
Length overall - Inches22
Length overall - Inches339.96
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard115 EXLPT OptiMax®
Engine/s standardTwin 200 XL OptiMax®
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail235 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Liters889.57
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel tank capacity - Gal235
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp
Engine max300 hp (each)
Operational Info
Maximum people5 / 1,072 lbs
Maximum people13

Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 vs Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 or the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010?
The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 is the longer of the two at 28,3 feet overall. The Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 comes in at 18,3 feet, making it roughly 10,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 or the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010?
For trailering, the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 has the edge at 6 lbs dry weight versus 18 lbs for the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 is certified for 13. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 measures 118" wide, compared to 98" for the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 or the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010?
The Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 has the bigger tank at 235 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013. That 230-gallon difference translates to roughly 690–1150 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 and Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Mako Boats 184 CC 2013 and the Mako Boats 284 Center Console 2010 are built by Mako Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.