Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 boat specs
Mako Boats
Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011
2011
View full specs →

Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 vs Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 vs Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 at 17,0 ft versus Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 at 18,3 ft. At 15 lbs and 18 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006's 125-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 carries 56 gallons versus 37 gallons in the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 with its 125-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeMako Boats
MakeMako Boats
Model171 Center Console
Model184 Center Console
Model Year2006
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam7 ft. 2 in
Beam8 ft. 2 in
Beam - Meters2.18
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches86
Beam - Inches98
Deadrise12℃
Deadrise18°
Draft [max] - Detail9 in
Draft [max] - Detail12 in
Draft [max] - Meters0.23
Draft [max] - Meters0.3
Draft [max] - Inches9
Draft [max] - Inches12
Weight - Detail1,500 lbs. Max. Cumulative Engine Weight: 420 lbs
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - kg680.39
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - lbs.15
Weight - lbs.18
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet18.33
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Inches207
Length overall - Inches22
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury? 90 ELPT Optimax? SW
Engine/s standard115 EXLPT OptiMax®
Fuel tank capacity - Detail37 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail56 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters140.06
Fuel tank capacity - Liters211.98
Fuel tank capacity - Gal37
Fuel tank capacity - Gal56
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max125 hp
Engine max150 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Operational Info
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people5 / 1,072 lbs

Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 vs Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 or the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011?
The Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 is the longer of the two at 18,3 feet overall. The Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 1,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 or the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011?
For trailering, the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 has the edge at 15 lbs dry weight versus 18 lbs for the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 tops out at 125 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 measures 98" wide, compared to 86" for the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 or the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011?
The Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 has the bigger tank at 56 gallons, versus 37 gallons on the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006. That 19-gallon difference translates to roughly 57–95 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 and Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Mako Boats 171 Center Console 2006 and the Mako Boats 184 Center Console 2011 are built by Mako Boats. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.