The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 is a modified-V design and the Lund SSV 16 2013 is a deep-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Lund SSV 16 2013 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 tips the scales at 840 lbs - 490 lbs more than the Lund SSV 16 2013 at 350 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling - 60 hp for the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 and 40 hp for the Lund SSV 16 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund SSV 16 2013 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration - meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.