Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 boat specs
Lund
Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Lund Mr. Pike 17  2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 vs Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 and the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 measures 20,7 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 at 17,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 tips the scales at 1 285 lbs — 1 263 lbs less than the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 at 22 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 has a 160-hp advantage over the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006's 140-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 carries 32 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 at 20,7 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 at 17,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model208 Pro-V GL
ModelMr. Pike 17
Model Year2012
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in
Beam93 in. Stern: 93 in
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches93
Weight - Detail2,200 lbs
Weight - Detail1,285 lbs
Weight - kg997.9
Weight - kg582.87
Weight - lbs.22
Weight - lbs.1285
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet20.67
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters6.3
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Inches248
Length overall - Inches206
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailAmidship: 35.5 in. Bow: 38 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters96.52
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches38
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .063 in. Bottom: .080 in. Twin Hull Plate: .080 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail60 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters227.12
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal6
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max300 hp
Engine max140 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 8 ft
Storagenot available
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,560 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people6
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailMarine Master
Trailer - Detailnot available

Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 vs Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 or the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006?
The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 is the longer of the two at 20,7 feet overall. The Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 3,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 or the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006?
For trailering, the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 has the edge at 22 lbs dry weight versus 1 285 lbs for the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 is rated to a maximum of 300 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 tops out at 140 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 measures 96" wide, compared to 93" for the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 or the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006?
The Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 has the bigger tank at 32 gallons, versus 6 gallons on the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012. That 26-gallon difference translates to roughly 78–130 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 and Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 208 Pro-V GL 2012 and the Lund Mr. Pike 17 2006 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.