Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 boat specs
Lund
Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 vs Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 and the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 measures 20,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 at 16,0 feet (2006). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 tips the scales at 1 105 lbs — 440 lbs more than the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 at 665 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 has a 85-hp advantage over the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model2000 Alaskan Tiller
ModelClassic 1625 SS
Model Year2013
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam90.5 in
Beam76 in. Stern: 76 in
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches90.5
Beam - Inches76
Depth - Detail39 in. bow
Depth - DetailAmidship: 33 in. Bow: 34.5 in
Depth - Centimeters99.06
Depth - Centimeters88.9
Depth - Inches39
Depth - Inches34.5
Weight - Detail1,105 lbs
Weight - Detail665 lbs
Weight - kg501.22
Weight - kg301.64
Weight - lbs.1105
Weight - lbs.665
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet20.5
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches246
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .063 in. Bottom: .063 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max125 hp
Engine max40 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 8 - 8.5 ft
Storagenot available
Maximum capacity2,100 lbs
Maximum capacity1,250 lbs
Maximum people7
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - Height6 ft. 2 in
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Length over all24 ft. 7 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Weight2,210 lbs
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft
Trailer - Widthnot available

Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 vs Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 or the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,5 feet overall. The Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 4,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 or the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006?
For trailering, the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 has the edge at 665 lbs dry weight versus 1 105 lbs for the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 is rated to a maximum of 125 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 measures 91" wide, compared to 76" for the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 and Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2013 and the Lund Classic 1625 SS 2006 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.