The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 is a deep-V design and the Lund Mr. Pike 16 2005 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 measures 20,5 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 4,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund Mr. Pike 16 2005 at 16,0 feet (2005). At 1 275 lbs and 1 215 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class - either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lund Mr. Pike 16 2005's 100-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads - 27 gal and 27 gal - so range won't be a tiebreaker here.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lund Mr. Pike 16 2005 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 7 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund Mr. Pike 16 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.