Matching a deep vee Lund 197 Pro-V GL 2013 against a modified vee Lund 2075 Pro-V SE 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 197 Pro-V GL 2013 at 19,6 ft versus Lund 2075 Pro-V SE 2012 at 20,7 ft. At 21 lbs and 19 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 300 hp, the Lund 2075 Pro-V SE 2012 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund 197 Pro-V GL 2013's 225-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 2075 Pro-V SE 2012 carries 62 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Lund 197 Pro-V GL 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 2075 Pro-V SE 2012 and its 300-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund 197 Pro-V GL 2013 with its 225-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.