Matching a deep vee Lund 186 Pro-V GL 2013 against a modified vee Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 186 Pro-V GL 2013 at 18,5 ft versus Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 at 16,0 ft. At 18 lbs and 9 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 200 hp, the Lund 186 Pro-V GL 2013 has a 125-hp advantage over the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 carries 19 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 186 Pro-V GL 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.