Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 vs Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 and the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 at 18,5 ft versus Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 at 16,0 ft. At 18 lbs and 84 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 tops out at 60 hp. Engine specs for the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 aren't listed — confirm with a dealer before selecting an outboard.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 carries 19 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model186 Pro Sport GL
ModelClassic 1660 SS
Model Year201
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in
Beam84 in. Stern: 82.5 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches84
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - Detail840 lbs
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - kg381.02
Weight - lbs.18
Weight - lbs.84
Width [transom] - Detail82.75 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches195
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailAmidship: 34 in. Bow: 36.5 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters93.98
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches36.5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .063 in. Bottom: .080 in. Twin Hull Plate: .063 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standard175 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. built-in tank
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxnot available
Engine max60 hp
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,350 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people6

Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 vs Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 or the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006?
The Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 or the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006?
For trailering, the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 84 lbs for the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 has a documented max rating of 60 hp. Engine specifications for the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 measures 98" wide, compared to 84" for the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 or the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006?
The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 and Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2010 and the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.