Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 boat specs
Lund
Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 boat specs
Lund
Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009
2009
View full specs →

Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 vs Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 and the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 are modified vee designs with fiberglass construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 measures 18,5 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 16,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 at 2,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 tips the scales at 1 275 lbs — 1 257 lbs less than the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 at 18 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 has a 50-hp advantage over the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009's 125-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 carries 27 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model186 Fisherman GL
Model2000 Alaskan DC
Model Year2011
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam98 in
Beam90.5 in
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Inches98
Beam - Inches90.5
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - Detail1,275 lbs
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - kg578.33
Weight - lbs.18
Weight - lbs.1275
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Inches222
Length overall - Inches246
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches6
Body / Hull
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max125 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft. 6 in. - 8 ft
Storagenot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailMarine Master
Trailer - Detailnot available

Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 vs Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 16,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009?
For trailering, the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 1 275 lbs for the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 tops out at 125 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 measures 98" wide, compared to 91" for the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 has the bigger tank at 27 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011. That 23-gallon difference translates to roughly 69–115 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 and Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2011 and the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2009 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.