Lund 1852MT 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1852MT 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lund 1852MT 2010 vs Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1852MT 2010 and the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1852MT 2010 at 18,0 ft versus Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 tips the scales at 785 lbs — 310 lbs less than the Lund 1852MT 2010 at 475 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 45 hp for the Lund 1852MT 2010 and 60 hp for the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1852MT 2010 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Lund 1852MT 2010 and Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1852MT
ModelClassic 1660 Tiller
Model Year201
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam75 in
Beam84 in. Stern: 82.5 in
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches75
Beam - Inches84
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - DetailAmidship: 34 in. Bow: 36.5 in
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters93.98
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches36.5
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - Detail785 lbs
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - kg356.07
Weight - lbs.475
Weight - lbs.785
Width [transom] - Detail52 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Inches216
Length overall - Inches195
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches3
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.072 in
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .063 in. Bottom: .080 in. Twin Hull Plate: .063 in
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max45 hp
Engine max60 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. built-in tank
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,375 lbs
Maximum capacity1,350 lbs
Maximum people6 / 815 lbs
Maximum people6

Lund 1852MT 2010 vs Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1852MT 2010 or the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1852MT 2010 or the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006?
For trailering, the Lund 1852MT 2010 has the edge at 475 lbs dry weight versus 785 lbs for the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1852MT 2010 tops out at 45 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 11 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 measures 84" wide, compared to 75" for the Lund 1852MT 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1852MT 2010 and Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1852MT 2010 and the Lund Classic 1660 Tiller 2006 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.