Matching a flat Lund 1852MT Jon 2013 against a modified vee Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1852MT Jon 2013 at 18,0 ft versus Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 at 20,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 tips the scales at 1 275 lbs — 800 lbs less than the Lund 1852MT Jon 2013 at 475 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 has a 60-hp advantage over the Lund 1852MT Jon 2013's 65-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1852MT Jon 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1852MT Jon 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.