Matching a deep vee Lund 1800 Sport Angler 2013 against a modified vee Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1800 Sport Angler 2013 at 18,5 ft versus Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 at 16,0 ft. At 146 lbs and 84 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Lund 1800 Sport Angler 2013 has a 115-hp advantage over the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1800 Sport Angler 2013 carries 41 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Lund 1800 Sport Angler 2013 at 18,5 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lund Classic 1660 SS 2006 at 16,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.