Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006
2006
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013
2013
View full specs →

Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 vs Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 against a deep vee Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 at 18,0 ft versus Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 at 18,3 ft. At 162 lbs and 122 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 has a 85-hp advantage over the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 and its 175-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 with its 90-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1800 Pro-V IFS?
Model1825 Pro Guide
Model Year2006
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam93 in. Stern: 93 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches93
Beam - Inches9
Depth - DetailAmidship: 35.5 in. Bow: 40 in
Depth - Detail40 in. bow
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Inches4
Depth - Inches4
Weight - Detail1,620 lbs
Weight - Detail1,220 lbs
Weight - kg734.82
Weight - kg553.38
Weight - lbs.162
Weight - lbs.122
Height [transom]25 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet18
Length - Feet18.33
Length - Inches4
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 4 in
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Meters5.59
Length overall - Inches22
Length overall - Inches22
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .080 in. Bottom: .100 in. Twin Hull Plate: .100 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal. ProPlus Reserve Fuel System
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max175 hp
Engine max90 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,640 lbs
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs
Maximum people6
Maximum people6
Storagenot available
StorageRod Storage: 6 ft. 6 in. - 7 ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height5 ft. 10.5 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 8 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,320 lbs
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in

Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 vs Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 or the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013?
The Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 is the longer of the two at 18,3 feet overall. The Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 comes in at 18,0 feet, making it roughly 0,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 or the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013?
For trailering, the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 has the edge at 122 lbs dry weight versus 162 lbs for the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 measures 93" wide, compared to 9" for the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 or the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013?
The Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 has the bigger tank at 32 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006. That 28-gallon difference translates to roughly 84–140 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 and Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1800 Pro-V IFS 2006 and the Lund 1825 Pro Guide 2013 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.