Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Lund 2010 Predator 2013 boat specs
Lund
Lund 2010 Predator 2013
2013
View full specs →

Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 vs Lund 2010 Predator 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a modified vee Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 against a deep vee Lund 2010 Predator 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 at 18,8 ft versus Lund 2010 Predator 2013 at 20,2 ft. At 103 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 2010 Predator 2013 has a 135-hp advantage over the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 carries 19 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Lund 2010 Predator 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 2010 Predator 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 18,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 2010 Predator 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1800 Alaskan SS
Model2010 Predator
Model Year2012
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam83 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches83
Beam - Inches9
Weight - Detail1,030 lbs
Weight - Detail1,600 lbs
Weight - kg467.2
Weight - kg725.75
Weight - lbs.103
Weight - lbs.16
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet18.75
Length - Feet20.17
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters5.72
Length overall - Meters6.15
Length overall - Inches225
Length overall - Inches242
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail39.5 in. bow
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches39.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal5
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max90 hp
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 9 ft
StorageRod Storage: 6 ft. 6 in. - 7 ft. 6 in
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people4
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Heightnot available
Trailer - Height6 ft. 5 in
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 9.5 in
Trailer - Weightnot available
Trailer - Weight2,989 lbs
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 4 in

Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 vs Lund 2010 Predator 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 or the Lund 2010 Predator 2013?
The Lund 2010 Predator 2013 is the longer of the two at 20,2 feet overall. The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 comes in at 18,8 feet, making it roughly 1,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 or the Lund 2010 Predator 2013?
For trailering, the Lund 2010 Predator 2013 has the edge at 16 lbs dry weight versus 103 lbs for the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 2010 Predator 2013 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 tops out at 90 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 2010 Predator 2013 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 measures 83" wide, compared to 9" for the Lund 2010 Predator 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 or the Lund 2010 Predator 2013?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 5 gallons on the Lund 2010 Predator 2013. That 14-gallon difference translates to roughly 42–70 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 and Lund 2010 Predator 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1800 Alaskan SS 2012 and the Lund 2010 Predator 2013 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.