Lund 1775 Pro-V  2005 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012
2012
View full specs →

Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 vs Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 and the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 at 17,0 ft versus Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 at 17,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 tips the scales at 1 355 lbs — 1 220 lbs more than the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 at 135 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 150 hp for the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 and 150 hp for the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 32 gal and 32 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1775 Pro-V
Model1775 Pro-V SE
Model Year2005
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam93 in
Beam95 in
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Inches93
Beam - Inches95
Weight - Detail1,355 lbs. (SE) 1,300 lbs. (Tiller)
Weight - Detail1,350 lbs
Weight - kg614.62
Weight - kg612.35
Weight - lbs.1355
Weight - lbs.135
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet17.83
Length - Inches2
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Meters5.99
Length overall - Inches206
Length overall - Inches236
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal. built-in tank ProPlus Reserve
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Engine max150 hp 80 hp (Tiller)
Engine max150 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,560 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people6
Maximum peoplenot available
Storagenot available
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r

Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 vs Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 or the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012?
The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 is the longer of the two at 17,8 feet overall. The Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 or the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012?
For trailering, the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 has the edge at 135 lbs dry weight versus 1 355 lbs for the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 9 lbs per hp for the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 measures 95" wide, compared to 93" for the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 and Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 32 gallons and 32 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 and Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1775 Pro-V 2005 and the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2012 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.