Matching a deep vee Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 against a modified vee Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 at 17,8 ft versus Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010 at 20,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010 tips the scales at 1 105 lbs — 970 lbs less than the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 at 135 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010's 125-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 27 gallons in the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2010 at 20,5 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lund 1775 Pro-V SE 2013 at 17,8 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.