The Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 is a deep-V design and the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2012 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 at 17,8 ft versus Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2012 at 20,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 tips the scales at 1 350 lbs - 245 lbs more than the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2012 at 1 105 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 has a 35-hp advantage over the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2012's 115-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 27 gallons in the Lund 2000 Alaskan Tiller 2012. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.