Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1950 Tyee  2013 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1950 Tyee 2013
2013
View full specs →

Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 vs Lund 1950 Tyee 2013: A Close Look at Two Deep-V Boats

Both the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 and the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 are deep-V designs, both built in aluminium, so the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 at 17,8 ft versus Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 at 19,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 tips the scales at 1 735 lbs - 385 lbs less than the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 at 1 350 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013's 150-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 carries 50 gallons versus 32 gallons in the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water - it handles 9 passengers and at 19,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1775 Pro-V IFS
Model1950 Tyee
Model Year2013
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in.
Beam98 in.
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches98
Depth - Detail40 in. bow
Depth - Detail48 in. bow
Depth - Centimeters101.6
Depth - Centimeters121.92
Depth - Inches40
Depth - Inches48
Weight - Detail1,350 lbs.
Weight - Detail1,735 lbs.
Weight - kg612.35
Weight - kg786.98
Weight - lbs.1350
Weight - lbs.1735
Height [transom]25 in.
Height [transom]25 in.
Length - Feet17.83
Length - Feet19.67
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 10 in.
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 8 in.
Length overall - Meters5.44
Length overall - Meters5.99
Length overall - Inches214
Length overall - Inches236
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeDeep Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Detail50 gal.
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Liters189.27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Fuel tank capacity - Gal50
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp
Engine max225 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft.
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft.
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs.
Maximum capacity2,000 lbs.
Maximum people6
Maximum people9
Trailer Info
Trailer - Height6 ft. 8 in.
Trailer - Height6 ft. 9 in.
Trailer - Length over all20 ft. 9 in.
Trailer - Length over all23 ft. 9.5 in.
Trailer - Weight2,606 lbs.
Trailer - Weight3,124 lbs.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in.
Trailer - Width8 ft. 4 in.

Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 vs Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 - Common Questions

Which is the larger boat - the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 or the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013?
The Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 is the longer of the two at 19,7 feet overall. The Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 comes in at 17,8 feet, making it roughly 1,8 ft shorter - a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer - the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 or the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013?
For trailering, the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 has the edge at 1 350 lbs dry weight versus 1 735 lbs for the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 is rated to a maximum of 225 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that - matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 is certified for 9. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing - on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 measures 98" wide, compared to 95" for the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states - anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank - the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 or the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013?
The Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 has the bigger tank at 50 gallons, versus 32 gallons on the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013. That 18-gallon difference translates to roughly 54–90 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 and Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes - both the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 and the Lund 1950 Tyee 2013 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.