Matching a deep vee Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1800 Pro-V SE 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 at 17,8 ft versus Lund 1800 Pro-V SE 2006 at 18,0 ft. At 135 lbs and 156 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Lund 1800 Pro-V SE 2006 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013 carries 32 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 1800 Pro-V SE 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1800 Pro-V SE 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 1775 Pro-V IFS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.