Matching a deep vee Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 against a modified vee Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 measures 17,8 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 15,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2009 at 2,0 feet (2009). At 117 lbs and 144 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 125 hp for the Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 and 115 hp for the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 carries 27 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.