Matching a deep vee Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 against a modified vee Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 at 17,8 ft versus Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 tips the scales at 145 lbs — 136 lbs more than the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 at 9 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 carries 26 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund Classic 1660 Sport 2006 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 1775 Crossover XS 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.