Matching a deep vee Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 at 17,5 ft versus Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 tips the scales at 1 345 lbs — 370 lbs more than the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006 at 975 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 carries 27 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1750 Tyee 2013 comes in at 9 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.