The Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 vs Lund UR1436F 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Lund UR1436F 2006 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 tips the scales at 855 lbs — 710 lbs more than the Lund UR1436F 2006 at 145 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund UR1436F 2006's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund UR1436F 2006 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Lund UR1436F 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1750 Outfitter SS 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund UR1436F 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.