The Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010 vs Lund U1756VDSF 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010 at 17,5 ft versus Lund U1756VDSF 2006 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010 tips the scales at 1 345 lbs — 1 271 lbs more than the Lund U1756VDSF 2006 at 74 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010 has a 70-hp advantage over the Lund U1756VDSF 2006's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund U1756VDSF 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2010 and its 150-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund U1756VDSF 2006 with its 80-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.