When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 and the Lund WC 16 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 at 17,0 ft versus Lund WC 16 2013 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 tips the scales at 1 345 lbs — 1 010 lbs more than the Lund WC 16 2013 at 335 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 135 hp, the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 has a 110-hp advantage over the Lund WC 16 2013's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lund WC 16 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1750 Fisherman 2009 and its 135-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund WC 16 2013 with its 25-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.