The Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 is a deep-V design and the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department - Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 at 16,8 ft versus Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 tips the scales at 1 750 lbs - 625 lbs less than the Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 at 1 125 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 carries a rated maximum of 90 hp. Engine data for the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 wasn't available in our records - check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 carries 40 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 186 Pro Sport GL 2009 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1675 Impact SS 2013 could be the deciding factor.