Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lund A 14  2006 boat specs
Lund
Lund A 14 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund A 14 2006 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund A 14 2006 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Lund A 14 2006 at 14,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 tips the scales at 785 lbs — 767 lbs more than the Lund A 14 2006 at 18 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 has a 45-hp advantage over the Lund A 14 2006's 15-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund A 14 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund A 14 2006 with its 15-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1660 Classic Tiller
ModelA 14
Model Year2007
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in
Beam61 in. Stern: 51.5 in
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters1.55
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches61
Weight - Detail785 lbs
Weight - Detail180 lbs
Weight - kg356.07
Weight - kg81.65
Weight - lbs.785
Weight - lbs.18
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]15 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet14
Length - Inches3
Length - Inches1
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Meters4.29
Length overall - Inches195
Length overall - Inches169
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - DetailAmidship: 21 in. Bow: 24.5 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches24.5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thicknessFreeboard: .063 in. Bottom: .063 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max15 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r
Trailer - Detailnot available
Operational Info
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity780 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people4

Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund A 14 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund A 14 2006?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lund A 14 2006 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund A 14 2006?
For trailering, the Lund A 14 2006 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 785 lbs for the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund A 14 2006 tops out at 15 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lund A 14 2006 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund A 14 2006 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 measures 84" wide, compared to 61" for the Lund A 14 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and Lund A 14 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund A 14 2006 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.