Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010
2010
View full specs →

Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 at 18,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 tips the scales at 785 lbs — 767 lbs more than the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 at 18 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 carries a rated maximum of 60 hp. Engine data for the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 wasn't available in our records — check the manufacturer's spec sheet before sizing a motor.Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 carries 19 gallons versus 4 gallons in the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 18,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1660 Classic Tiller
Model186 Fisherman GL
Model Year2007
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam84 in
Beam98 in
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Meters2.49
Beam - Inches84
Beam - Inches98
Weight - Detail785 lbs
Weight - Detail1,800 lbs
Weight - kg356.07
Weight - kg816.47
Weight - lbs.785
Weight - lbs.18
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet18.5
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 3 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters4.95
Length overall - Meters5.64
Length overall - Inches195
Length overall - Inches222
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail82.75 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialFiberglass
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standard175 hp
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine maxnot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r
Trailer - Detailnot available
Operational Info
Storagenot available
StorageRod Storage: 11 rods

Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,5 feet overall. The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 2,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010?
For trailering, the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 has the edge at 18 lbs dry weight versus 785 lbs for the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
What is the maximum horsepower rating for these boats?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 has a documented max rating of 60 hp. Engine specifications for the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 were not available in our database — check the OEM spec sheet or manufacturer's website for confirmation.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 measures 98" wide, compared to 84" for the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010?
The Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 has the bigger tank at 19 gallons, versus 4 gallons on the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010. That 15-gallon difference translates to roughly 45–75 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1660 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund 186 Fisherman GL 2010 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.