When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1650 Rebel 2005 and the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1650 Rebel 2005 measures 16,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 14,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2007 tips the scales at 1 275 lbs — 460 lbs less than the Lund 1650 Rebel 2005 at 815 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2007 has a 65-hp advantage over the Lund 1650 Rebel 2005's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 2000 Alaskan DC 2007 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lund 1650 Rebel 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.