Matching a deep vee Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 against a modified vee Lund WC 16 2005 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 16,5 ft versus Lund WC 16 2005 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund WC 16 2005 tips the scales at 335 lbs — 327 lbs less than the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 has a 65-hp advantage over the Lund WC 16 2005's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund WC 16 2005 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lund WC 16 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund WC 16 2005 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.