Matching a deep vee Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 16,5 ft versus Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 at 19,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 tips the scales at 175 lbs — 167 lbs less than the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 has a 135-hp advantage over the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 carries 45 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
Bottom line: The Lund 1900 Pro-V LE 2006 at 19,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 16,5 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.