The Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS 2013 is a deep-V design and the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2008 is a modified-V design, so you're likely deciding between two noticeably different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2008 measures 20,0 feet overall (2008), giving it roughly 3,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS 2013 at 16,5 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2008 tips the scales at 1 600 lbs - 750 lbs less than the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS 2013 at 850 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2008 has a 135-hp advantage over the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS 2013's 90-hp ceiling - enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2008 carries 50 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1650 Rebel XL SS 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers - a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.