Lund 1648M 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1648M 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 boat specs
Lund
Lund Pro Angler 17 2007
2007
View full specs →

Lund 1648M 2010 vs Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1648M 2010 and the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1648M 2010 at 15,8 ft versus Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 at 17,0 ft. At 42 lbs and 121 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 has a 40-hp advantage over the Lund 1648M 2010's 35-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1648M 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1648M 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1648M 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1648M
ModelPro Angler 17
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in
Beam93 in
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters2.36
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches93
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail420 lbs
Weight - Detail1,210 lbs
Weight - kg190.51
Weight - kg548.85
Weight - lbs.42
Weight - lbs.121
Width [transom] - Detail48 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]15 or 20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet15.83
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Meters5.23
Length overall - Inches19
Length overall - Inches206
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.072 in
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max35 hp
Engine max75 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail32 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters121.13
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal32
Operational Info
Maximum capacity973 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum people4 / 555 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r

Lund 1648M 2010 vs Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1648M 2010 or the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007?
The Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Lund 1648M 2010 comes in at 15,8 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1648M 2010 or the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007?
For trailering, the Lund 1648M 2010 has the edge at 42 lbs dry weight versus 121 lbs for the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1648M 2010 tops out at 35 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1648M 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1648M 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 measures 93" wide, compared to 7" for the Lund 1648M 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1648M 2010 and Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1648M 2010 and the Lund Pro Angler 17 2007 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.