When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1648M 2010 and the Lund 170SEE 2005 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1648M 2010 at 15,8 ft versus Lund 170SEE 2005 at 17,0 ft. At 42 lbs and 65 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 35 hp for the Lund 1648M 2010 and 50 hp for the Lund 170SEE 2005. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 170SEE 2005 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1648M 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 170SEE 2005 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1648M 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 170SEE 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 170SEE 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1648M 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.