Matching a deep vee Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 measures 25,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 8,8 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013 at 16,3 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013 tips the scales at 862 lbs — 689 lbs more than the Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 at 173 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 has a 165-hp advantage over the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 could be the deciding factor.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1975 Pro-V SE 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 25,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1625 Fury XL SS 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.