Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 boat specs
Lund
Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008
2008
View full specs →

Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 measures 16,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 14,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). At 63 lbs and 144 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1625 Classic Tiller
Model2010 Pro Guide
Model Year2007
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam76 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches76
Beam - Inches9
Weight - Detail630 lbs
Weight - Detail1,440 lbs
Weight - kg285.76
Weight - kg653.17
Weight - lbs.63
Weight - lbs.144
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]25 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet2
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 2 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters6.15
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches242
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardMercury
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp
Engine max115 hp with standard tiller motor 175 hp with hydraulic assist steering
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail40 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters151.42
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal4
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r

Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 vs Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008?
The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 14,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 or the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008?
For trailering, the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 has the edge at 63 lbs dry weight versus 144 lbs for the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 measures 76" wide, compared to 9" for the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 and Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1625 Classic Tiller 2007 and the Lund 2010 Pro Guide 2008 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.